Colonial powers didn't truly relinquish control. In many cases, former colonial powers like the UK effectively outsourced it to handpicked dictators. Mobutu ruled DRC for 32 years with western backing. He borrowed $12+ billion, and embezzled $5+ billion to Swiss banks. The World Bank and IMF kept lending because Mobutu protected western mining interests. When Mobutu fell, DRC inherited the debt. The population, which never benefited, services obligations created by a western-backed dictator.
This pattern has been repeated time and time again. France, for example, supported dictators in Togo, Gabon and Chad. They borrowed massively, protected foreign interests, stole the proceeds, and left their populations with unsustainable debt for which ordinary people continue to pay the price.
The 1884 Berlin Conference carved up the African continent with no regard for existing societies. Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Chad, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe were all landlocked by colonial design, making export costs 2-3 times higher. These borders have also created ethnic tensions, contributing to conflicts that have generated military costs and huge reconstruction debts, and that continue to contribute to conflicts raging today - including in countries to which the UK government has recently cut its humanitarian aid.
When the 1980s debt crises hit, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) - based in Washington DC - stepped in with economic conditions that replicated colonial policies. IMF bailout conditions required countries to privatise state-owned businesses, open their markets to foreign competition, liberalise trade, focus on export agriculture, and cut social spending, often damaging local industries and long-term development.
Ghana was a particularly stark example. Under IMF programmes, its post-independence industrialisation was dismantled and the country was effectively returned to its colonised role: exporting raw materials like cocoa, and importing expensive manufactured goods from wealthier countries.
Today's debt extracts wealth, just like colonialism did, it just uses financial tools rather than military ones. Interest flows from African taxpayers to bondholders in New York, London and Paris. If colonialism was theft and debt structures perpetuate colonial extraction, shouldn't colonial debt be offset against financial debts supposedly owed? In short: debt cancellation isn't charity, it's repairing historical theft.